Calmping vs UptimeRobot

UptimeRobot is a mature, popular monitor with broad check coverage and an unusually generous free tier. If you want the widest set of simple checks for free, it's hard to beat. Calmping's difference is what happens after a check fails — it confirms the failure, opens an incident with the evidence attached, drafts the postmortem, and remembers the fix — plus database-aware checks, AI diagnosis, an open MCP server any AI agent can query (Claude, Cursor, Codex, or your own), a privacy-first status page, and the option to self-host.

Feature comparison

CapabilityCalmpingUptimeRobot
HTTP, keyword, port, SSL, DNS, latency & heartbeat checksYesYes
Database-aware checks (Postgres, MySQL, Redis, Mongo)YesPort/UDP only
JSON-field & custom-assertion checksYesKeyword only
Auto-drafted postmortems after each incidentYes
Per-app memory (surfaces last working fix)Yes
AI incident diagnosis (bring your own key)Yes
Open MCP server (read-only access from any AI agent — Claude, Cursor, Codex…)Yes
Privacy-first status page (hides target URLs & ports)YesPublic pages
Encrypted app-scoped secrets (AES-256)Yes
Self-hostableYesSaaS only
Incident tracking & integrations (Slack, Discord, webhooks)YesYes
Free tier1 app50 monitors

Which should you pick?

Choose UptimeRobot if…

You want the most free monitors (its free tier is generous), broad simple checks, and a public status page — and you don't need database-aware checks, postmortems, or self-hosting.

Choose Calmping if…

You monitor databases, want auto-postmortems and memory after an incident, care about data privacy or self-hosting, or want AI-assisted diagnosis when something breaks.

Start free — no credit card

Comparison based on publicly documented features; competitor plans and features change over time — check each provider's current pricing before deciding. Calmping monitoring currently runs from Frankfurt, with additional regions on the roadmap.